Skip to content

Communism and Catching Pigs

Valuable lesson. Freedom is not free.

There was a chemistry professor in a large college who had some exchange students in the class. One day while the class was in the lab, the professor noticed one young man, an exchange student, who kept rubbing his back and stretching as if his back hurt. The professor asked the young man what was the matter. The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting Communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country’s government and install a new Communist regime.

While telling his story, he looked at the professor and asked a strange question: “Do you know how to catch wild pigs?” The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young man said that it was no joke.

“You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come everyday to eat the free corn. When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming.

“When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat again. You continue until you have all four Sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side. The pigs, used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat that free corn again. You then slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd.

“Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are trapped. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.”

The young man then told the professor that this is exactly what he sees happening in America. The government keeps pushing us toward Communism/Socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tax exemptions, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare, subsidized housing, school programs, medicine, drugs, etc. We continually lose our freedoms, just a little at a time.

God help us when the gate slams shut.

We should always remember two truths: There is no such thing as a free lunch, and you can never hire someone to provide a service for you cheaper than you can do it yourself. If you see that all of this wonderful government ‘help’ is a problem confronting the future of freedom in America, you might want to send this on to your friends.

The dangers of relying on an increasingly powerful government are real, so the warning against Socialism and Communism should be heeded. The United States of America is headed down a dangerous road to a place where we have fewer freedoms and a totalitarian central government. However, the last paragraph is somewhat muddled; hiring someone to do something for you is part of capitalism and the free market, the antithesis of Communism. The problem is when the government is the goods or service provider. It is paid by taking money from other people at gunpoint, running it through an inefficient bureaucracy, doing the job poorly, and making you dependent on its “free” services.

If you forward this email, you might want to send all but the last paragraph. It makes the point better without it.

Peter Davies and The Elephant

In 1986, Peter Davies was on holiday in Kenya after graduating from Northwestern University.

On a hike through the bush, he came across a young bull elephant standing with one leg raised in the air. The elephant seemed distressed, so Peter approached it very carefully.

He got down on one knee and inspected the elephant’s foot and found a large piece of wood deeply embedded in it. As carefully and as gently as he could, Peter worked the wood out with his hunting knife, after which the elephant gingerly put down its foot. The elephant turned to face the man, and with a rather curious look on its face, stared at him for several tense moments. Peter stood frozen, thinking of nothing else but being trampled. Eventually the elephant trumpeted loudly, turned, and walked away. Peter never forgot that elephant or the events of that day.

Twenty years later, Peter was walking through the Chicago Zoo with his teenaged son. As they approached the elephant enclosure, one of the creatures turned and walked over to near where Peter and his son Cameron were standing. The large bull elephant stared at Peter, lifted its front foot off the ground, then put it down. The elephant did that several times then trumpeted loudly, all the while staring at the man.

Remembering the encounter in 1986, Peter couldn’t help wondering if this was the same elephant. Peter summoned up his courage, climbed over the railing and made his way into the enclosure. He walked right up to the elephant and stared back in wonder. The elephant trumpeted again, wrapped its trunk around one of Peter legs and slammed him against the railing, killing him instantly.

Probably wasn’t the same elephant.

This is for all of my friends who send me those heart-warming stories.

Update: Sigh. Yeah, well, apparently it wasn’t obvious enough for some folks, but this is a joke email. Posted here because it’s funny.

Billions Ago

If you’re like me, you’ve received emails purporting to explain just how big a billion is with helpful illustrations about Christ living a billion minutes ago and other things happening a billion somethings ago. Depending on the source, there are often minor differences in the “other things.” You might have seen this in magazines or other publications as well. In most cases this leads up a point they’re trying to make about a billion something or another.

Accurate?

The illustrations are pretty close but not exact. At the time of this writing, a billion minutes (about 1901.25 years) ago was around 105 AD, seventy-some years after Christ was crucified. However, we can cut some slack here since it depends on where you round, and it’s more-or-less the time of Christ — plus, it makes a better point than “a billion minutes ago Pliny the Younger died.”

Let look at it from the other direction. 1977 years ago Jesus was probably in His mid- to late- twenties. 1977 years times 365.25 days in a year times 24 hours in a day times 60 minutes in an hour is just under 1.04 billion minutes. Pretty close, and though .04 billion minutes is more than seventy years, the point is to illustrate how big a billion is and this works well. Sticklers can use “Christ was crucified approximately 1.04 billion minutes ago” — until around 2025 when then should start saying 1.05 billion minutes.

Time Flies

The “other things” usually line up pretty well too, but be careful with a billion seconds; they get away from you fast. A billion seconds ago is not quite 31.7 years. Harry S. Truman was President a billion seconds before 1976-1984, not 2006.

In 1980, a letter to the editor claimed that A billion seconds ago was the Pearl Harbor attack. While it could have been a reasonably accurate claim between early 1971 and early 1974-ish, it certainly was not true in 1980.

In 2005, a publication’s use of “Billions Ago” claims A billion seconds ago it was 1959. That’s pretty far off.

Origins

But from where did this attempt to explain the hugeness of a billion originate?

We can speculate that the mention of Christ living a billion minutes ago means a variant of this started around 1920. Perhaps. Perhaps not.

After some research, the earliest mention I found turns out to have been in The Numbers Game by Bill Gold of The Washington Post, on October 21, 1977.

The FDIC News, which is published by employees of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., suggests that most people have lost sight of how much a billion really is.

The News puts it this way: “One billion seconds ago, the first atomic bomb had not yet been exploded. One billion minutes ago, Christ was still on earth. One billion hours ago, men were still living in caves. yet one billion dollars ago, in terms of government spending, was yesterday.”

For many people, millions and billions are almost indistinguishable. An Ann Landers reader made reference on Wednesday of this week to the “600 million cigarettes” bought each year at a cost of “$13 billion.” If true, that would work out to a price of $21.67 per cigarette, I think.

Then, just over 190 million seconds later, on the day after Christmas, 1983, The New York Times quoted Donald Wilkinson of the Farm Credit Administration, in Required Reading.

The Depth of the Debt

Donald E. Wilkinson, governor of the Farm Credit Administration, in speech to an agricultural cooperative, Oct. 28, 1983:

We read about the financial problems of Mexico, Brazil and some of the third world countries while we forget that the United States is in debt to the tune of $1.4 trillion. That is one thousand and four hundred billion dollars.

For most of us, these kinds of numbers are beyond comprehension. I do not know if I can put even a billion in perspective, but let me try.

A billion seconds ago, Harry Truman was President of the United States.

A billion minutes ago was just after the time of Christ.

A billion hours ago, many had not yet walked on the face of the earth.

And a billion dollars ago was late yesterday at the U.S. Treasury.

Back in 1979, Harry J. Gray used the “Billions Ago” device in Aviation Week & Space Technology:

In September of last year, Willard Butcher, the president of the Chase Manhattan Bank, estimated the price we all pay for government regulatory costs to be more than $100 billion.

Most people don’t realize how big a billion of anything is. Just a billion seconds ago, Harry Truman and Tom Dewey were campaigning for the Presidency. A billion minutes ago, Jesus Christ had been dead for less than 50 years. A billion hours ago, men were living in caves. But a billion dollars ago, in terms of government regulatory costs, was only three-and-a-half days ago.

It’s the Real Thing

Another, more clever use of “Billions Ago” was by the late Coca-Cola CEO Roberto C. Goizueta in November, 1996. This also appears in Coca-Cola’s 1996 Annual Report.

A billion hours ago, human life appeared on Earth. A billion minutes ago, Christianity emerged. A billion seconds ago, the Beatles performed on Ed Sullivan. A billion Coca-Colas ago was yesterday morning.

And the question we are asking ourselves now is: What must we do to make a billion Coca-Colas ago be this morning?

So, “Billions Ago” has been around for a while now, and probably before those listed above. At its heart is a snazzy way of making some point, be it political, financial, or otherwise. If you use it, check your seconds.

Grasping Numbers

Efforts to help us grasp the enormity of enormous numbers is a common theme. Large numbers like a million, a billion, and a twenty-kazillion are still used interchangeably by a population increasingly sketchy on the subject of math and numbers. A case could be made that politicians and hucksters of all sorts are content with teaming populations disinterested in how numbers work. Politicians spend billions of our money like it’s pocket change. Hucksters promoting junk science or the latest cause celeb toss around “statistics” to support their agendas. Most people hear the figures bandied about and think “um, okay.”

Though imperfect, the crime drama Numb3rs does an entertaining job of making math interesting, showing its relevance to everyday life. The show’s creators have done a remarkable job of bringing some pizazz back into the field. Seasons one and two are available on DVD and highly recommended. The too-cheesy synopsis from Amazon doesn’t really do it justice: In the Los Angeles office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Special Agent Don Eppes and his team investigate critical and baffling crimes with a special edge. That advantage is Don’s brother, Charlies Eppes, a brilliant universalist mathematician who uses the science of mathematics with its complex equations to ferret out the most tricky criminals. With this team, the forces of evil learn their number is up.

Missing Child, Ashley Flores

If you’ve received this email about a missing 13 year-old girl, Ashley Flores, either Reply-All that this is a hoax, or simply delete the email.

Again, this is a hoax.

Subject: MISSING CHILD

Maybe if everyone passes this on, someone will see this child. That is how the girl from Stevens Point was found by circulation of her picture on tv. The internet circulates even overseas, South America, and Canada etc. Thanks

Please pass this to everyone in your address book.

We have a Deli manager (Acme Markets) from Philadelphia, Pa who has a 13 year old daughter who has been missing for 2 weeks. Keep the picture moving on. With luck on her side she will be found.

“I am asking you all, begging you to please forward this email on to anyone and everyone you know, PLEASE. My 13 year old girl, Ashley Flores, is missing. She has been missing for now two weeks.

It is still not too late. Please help us. If anyone any where knows anything, please contact me at: HelpfindAshleyFlores@yahoo.com, I am including a picture of her. All prayers are appreciated!!”

It only takes 2 seconds to forward this. If it was your child, you would want all the help you could get.

While there is an Ashley Flores in Philadelphia, she isn’t thirteen and she isn’t missing. In fact, this email was cobbled together from several previous missing-child emails and sent out as a prank. Unfortunately, it has tied up resources of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and various law enforcement agencies who diligently look into cases like this.

What happened was that Ashley’s friend, Vixter609, sent out the email as a joke sometime in May, 2006 and people took it seriously and wanted to help. Obviously Vixter609 is not a deep thinker and probably meant no harm, but it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that this sort of nonsense can interfere with efforts to find real missing children.

Smart Email Tip 3 – Condense

If you receive an email with several blank lines between each line or paragraph, such as the following, please condense it before blasting it back out to all your email buddies. This Smart Email Tip walks you through an example of how to turn a sure-to-annoy, deleted email into an emotional powerhouse that’s possibly forwarded ten thousand times or more.

Subject: Fwd: FW: FWD: Fw: You musT forward this NOW!!!!
 

I never forward these things but this is so spacial it make your head explode., Twice
 

.
 

This makes me cry so much MUCH that I JUST have to send it to you
 

try not to cry about these facts
 

 

1) When baby kittens faint an angel sings a song on a cloud to give it happy dreams
 

 

2) Last week a town in North Germany made kittens illegal
 

to adopt and an entire city in Guana heard angels crying.
 

This is true. The NEW YORK MAGAZINE had an story on it. Check your
 

facts its true.
 

 

3) Angels and kittens are found holding hands together in ancient literature all the time.
 


 

10) If you love kittens and angels, you must forward this email to twenty-five email buddies in the next ten minutes or fifty angels and kittens will crYU>> and hate you.

Recommendation

If you really must alert your friends that kittens and angels hold the key to each others' happiness, please:

  • Remove excess blank lines from the email, allowing only a single carriage return at the ends of paragraphs. Do not use carriage returns at the ends of lines within the same paragraph. If you must create an intentional blank line, additional carriage returns are acceptable.
  • Pull broken words or punctuation together. In the case above, the period sitting by itself a line or two after "Twice" needs to be brought up to just after "Twice."
  • Condense the subject line from "Fwd: FW: FWD: Fw: You musT forward this NOW!!!!" to something more meaningful, such as "Kittens and Angels"
  • Use the opportunity to correct a few mistakes, such as changing "cry so much MUCH" to "cry so much" and "I never forward these things but this is so spacial it make your head explode., Twice" to "I always forward these things because my head has exploded twice"

Benefits

Condensing does not take very long, as it's mostly a matter of deleting blank lines. It will dramatically increase the ease with which (and the likelihood that) your email will be read, and is simply good form.

Once you've adjusted the above email to something more like the following, you'll be ready to hit Send.

Subject: Kittens and Angels

I always forward these things because my head has exploded twice. This makes me cry so much that I just had to send it to you. Try not to cry about these facts.

1. When baby kittens faint an angel sings a song on a cloud to give it happy dreams.

2. Last week a town in North Germany made kittens illegal to adopt and an entire city in Guana heard angels crying. This is true. The NEW YORK MAGAZINE had an story on it. Check the facts -- it's true.

3. Angels and kittens are found holding hands together in ancient literature all the time.

...

10. If you love kittens and angels, you must forward this email to twenty-five email buddies in the next ten minutes or fifty angels and kittens will cry and hate you.

Bonus Tip

Learn to separate admittedly interesting angel and kitten folklore from weak attempts at blackmail. So in this case you can safely remove item "10" from the list above. The resulting email will have the same deeply-emotional impact on your reader and it will be less likely to be immediately deleted.

Spooky Patterns, Or Not

This is so crazy-weird you just will not believe it. Did you know that the events of September 11th, 2001 have torn a hole in the mathematical underpinnings of the universe. Either that or it is some despicable right-wing hard leftist Muslim Jewish conspiracy. Or something like that.

The Email

I don’t usually like to send these but this is weird. This is actually really freaky!! (mainly the end part, but read it all first): New York City has 11 letters, Afghanistan has 11 letters, Ramsin Yuseb (The terrorist who threatened to destroy the Twin Towers in 1993) has 11 letters, George W Bush has 11 letters.

This could be a mere coincidence, but this gets more interesting: New York is the 11th state; the first plane crashing against the Twin Towers was flight number 11, Flight 11 was carrying 92 passengers. 9 + 2 = 11; Flight 77 which hit the Pentagon, was carrying 65 passengers. 6+5 = 11; the tragedy was on September 11, or 9/11 as it is now known. 9 + 1+ 1 = 11; the date is equal to the US emergency services telephone number 911. 9 + 1 + 1 = 11.

Sheer coincidence..?! Read on and make up your own mind: The total number of victims inside all the hi-jacked planes was 254. 2 + 5 + 4 = 11; September 11 is day number 254 of the calendar year. Again 2 + 5 + 4 = 11; the Madrid bombing took place on 3/11/2004 . 3 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 4 = 11; the tragedy of Madrid happened 911 days after the Twin Towers incident.

Now this is where things get totally eerie: Try this and see how you feel afterwards, it made my hair stand on end: Open Microsoft Word and do the following: Type in capitals Q33 NY. This is the flight number of the first plane to hit one of the Twin Towers; highlight the Q33 NY; change the font size to 48; change the actual font to the WINGDINGS.

What do you think now?!! makes ya think?????

What do I think now? I think someone is full of it. Was the first plane to hit the towers Flight 11, or was it Flight Q33 NY? That is weird. Wait! “that is weird” has 11 letters! I heard the news on 9/11 and 9 + 1 + 1 = 11 and “heard the news” has 11 letters! Oh, my, that is crazy! Whoops! “that is crazy” has 11 letters! OH NO!

Some Facts

Flight 77 had 64 passengers on board when it hit the Pentagon. Madrid was 912 days after 9/11/01. Bill Clinton has 11 letters in his name too and he was more responsible for 9/11 than George W Bush, the 43rd President of the USA. But then on the other hand, W is the 22nd letter and 2 + 2 + 4 + 3 = 11 and 22 = 2 x 11. (Yes, I know W is the 23rd letter, but that wouldn’t be quite as “spooky.”)

There were 265 total passengers (2 + 6 + 5 = 13), or if you discount the 19 hijackers, you get 246 (2 + 4 + 6 = 12). Not 254 (that’s just wrong).

The email chooses a very weird name variant (Ramsin Yuseb) for one, admittedly high-profile, terrorist connected to the Twin Towers. It’s one of many possible transliterations of his Arabic name, most often rendered as Ramzi Yousef or Ramzi Youssef, born Abdul Basit Mah moud Abdul Karim. He has dozens of aliases, and is most often known as Ramzi Ahmed Yousef or Ramzi Mohammed Yousef.

But, wait! What about Mohammed Atta or the rest of the actual 9/11 hijackers? Khalid Almihdhar, Majed Moqed, Nawaf Alhazmi, Salem Alhazmi, Hani Hanjour, Satam Alsuqami, Waleed Alshehri, Wail Alshehri, Abdulaziz Alomari, Marwan Alshehhi, Ahmed Fayez, Ahmed Alghamdi, Hamza Alghamdi, Mohand Alshehri, Saeed Alghamdi, Ahmed Alhaznawi, Ahmed Alnami, and Zaid Jarrah?

Only one 9/11 hijacker, Ahmed Alnami, has 11 letters in his name. Besides the fact that these “men” have many aliases, there are dozens of ways to transliterate their Arabic names.

There are thousands of names and phrases associated with September 11th and the World Trade Center that this email conveniently ignores. Try this exercise: write down all the names, topics, and phrases you can find or think of that are tied to 9/11. Now count the letters in each. Some have eleven letters, of course, but others have three or ten or twenty or seventeen letters.

Whoever is responsible for collecting these supposed 9/11 facts has hand-picked some things that can get you to “11″ and made up a bunch of other junk out of thin air. No doubt peddling some moonbat conspiracy theory.

Recommendation

Set the record straight. Reply-All to the email, change the subject to “Spooky Email is Bogus,” and include the above explanation or your own variant of it.

Chicken Guns

Does NASA or the FAA have a Chicken Gun they use to test aircraft windshields? Did they loan it to the British, who later had to be told to use thawed chickens? Uh, kind of, and maybe-maybe not.

It starts one of a few ways, such as this:

In an issue of Meat & Poultry magazine, editors quoted from “Feathers,” the publication of the California Poultry Industry Federation, telling the following story: The US Federal Aviation Administration has a unique device for testing the strength of windshields on airplanes. The device is a gun that launches a dead chicken at a plane’s windshield at approximately the speed the plane flies. The theory is that if the windshield doesn’t crack from the carcass impact, it’ll survive a real collision with a bird during flight. …

Or maybe like this:

This is true! Sometimes it DOES take a Rocket Scientist! Scientists at NASA built a gun specifically to launch dead chickens at the windshields of airliners, military jets and the space shuttle, all traveling at maximum velocity. The idea is to simulate the frequent incidents of collisions with airborne fowl to test the strength of the windshields. …

And the punchline is: The FAA [or NASA] engineers had one recommendation: “Use a thawed chicken.”

(Another, older variant has a cat wandering into a loaded chicken gun and becoming part of the test.)

Okay let’s take a breath. It’s an interesting idea, and kind of funny, but is it true or is it a hoax?

There is, in fact, a chicken gun. (And probably plenty of others owned by other agencies.)

The USAF Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC)’s Ballistic Impact Range S-3 (“The Chicken Gun”) is used to determine the effect of impacts on, say, aircraft cockpits. Recently it was used to help NASA test impacts of foam on the Space Shuttle. For some previous stories on the Chicken Gun, see some articles on Army truck testing and tests against the Raytheon T-6A.

Whether the idea or “the gun” (which is really a test range) was loaned to the Brits is anyone’s guess.

Impact testing on the canopy of an F-16 Fighting Falcon.

Denzel Washington and Fisher House

Quick! Your email says Denzel Washington visited Brooks Army Medical Center and was so worked up about about the Fisher House program that he took out his checkbook and wrote a check right there for the cost of a new Fisher House. On top of that, the email points out that his visit and generosity didn’t make the paper while the anti-war ravings of other celebrities make the front page. Do you forward it on? Tricky tricky.

A little bit of searching turns up some websites claiming it’s “false, but…” and others claiming it’s “true, but…” Chalk that up to the bias of the individual website. You’ll also find a defensive rebuttal by the San Antonio Express News.

Well, obviously the best source for info is the Fisher House themselves. There you can find a Stars and Stripes article, for which another search turns up the original at the Stars and Stripes site itself.

So it’s a good story, but a little confusing. The attacks on media bias are understandable, since celebrity nut jobs do get a lot of press. The attempt to brag about Mr. Washington’s support for the troops and his generosity is certainly warranted. However, blindly forwarding erroneous information hurts rather than helps.

Other annoyances with the email include referring to the Brooke Army Medical Center as “Brooks,” big crazy formatting of the text, underlined text that is not a link, and the obligatory plea to forward it to everyone “This needs as wide a distribution as we can create” (of course in huge, blue underlined text).

So do you just delete it? Ehh… how about changing the Subject: line from “Fwd: Fwd: Re: Denzel Washington” to “Denzel Washington’s True Generosity” and recording the real story? Then forward that to your email friends (and back to whomever sent the flawed original to you). Politely set the record straight. Then if it really moved you, donate to the Fisher House yourself!

According to the Stars and Stripes,

Officials from the Fisher House Foundation want the public to know the Academy Award-winning actor is a generous donor to their efforts. But an e-mail forward which has him single-handedly building new facilities for them is nothing more than an urban legend.

See also articles at the Fisher House website here and here.

Denzel and Pauletta Washington also became members of the Fisher House Board of Trustees.

It should be noted that arch-liberal Garry Trudeau is also donating proceeds to Fisher House. From the Fisher House Angels page: “Mr. Trudeau has donated the advance and all royalties from his newest book to Fisher House Foundation™.”

Smart Email Tip 2 – Unquote

Greater than nothing.

Suppose you get a forwarded email that looks like the following, and further suppose that you want to follow its instructions and pass it on to everyone you know:

>>>>
>>>>This is
>>>amazing!!!!!!
>>>>>>Look up your first name in this
>>>>>list and add
>>>>>>one to the numbor after the
>>>>>name
>>>>>>or add your name followed by
>>>>>a 1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Andy 4
>>>>>>>Bobby 2
>>>>>>>Cindy 2
…and so on…
>
>

Stop! Do not forward it until you clean it up. That means removing all those “>” characters beginning each line, then taking out the extra line breaks.

So let’s pretend you got the email in the example above. What do you do? Do you hit “Forward” as fast as you can, update the number by your name, then dump your contact list in the To: line and hit “Send?” Nope. Don’t do it.

Resist the urge.

Get rid of the “>” symbols. If your email program will let you, search-and-replace all the “>” with “” (nothing). If you can’t do that from within your email program, you can copy the text of the email to a text editor and search-replace there. (Select all the text in your email, use Edit/Copy or hit Control-C to copy the text to the clipboard, then in the text editor use Edit/Paste or Control-V to paste the text.) For example, most Windows programs will search and replace text if you hit Control-H. A little dialog will open with “Find what:” and “Replace with:” fields. Put “>” in the first field and nothing in the second field, then hit replace-all (or replace them one at a time if the email contains >’s that you don’t wish to replace). Now your text looks like this:

This is
amazing!!!!!!
Look up your first name in this
list and add
one to the numbor after the
name
or add your name followed by
a 1

Andy 4
Bobby 2
Cindy 2
…and so on…

Looking better, huh? You’re not done yet. Now you want to fix up those lines at the beginning. Put them back together, using your best judgement, and increment the number by your name (or, since “Cedric” isn’t in the list, add it). You might even fix that spelling error, changing “numbor” to “number.” Now you’ve got:

This is amazing!!!!!!

Look up your first name in this list and add one to the numbor after the name or add your name followed by a 1:

Andy 4
Bobby 2
Cedric 1
Cindy 2
…and so on…

You’re ready to copy the text back to your email program, add your recipients, and hit Send.

Smart Email Tip 1 – Use Mixed Case

Stop shouting!

Sometimes we receive email that looks like this:

YOU HAVE TO READ THIS ITS VARY IMPORTANT!!! THE FACTS IN THIS EMAIL ARE WITHOUT QUESTION THE MOST IMPORTANT INFORMATION YOU WILL RECEIVE TODAY ABOUT THE KING OF THE GOLD MONKEY COAST AND HIS INDUSTRIOUS PEOPLE, SO DON’T HESITATE TO READ IT SEVERAL TIMES TO GET ALL THE INFORMATION INTO YOUR HEAD BEFORE YOU FORWARD IT TO TEN FRIENDS FOR GOOD GOLD MONKEY LUCK…

There are several reasons not to do this. For one, it is thought that text you write in all caps looks like you’re yelling at the reader. Also, and somewhat related, is that it’s rude to not take the time or care to type in mixed case.

Most important, though, is that it is hard to read. Wherever possible, the brain often reads words and phrases by shape, and more distinctive word “shapes” are formed by mixing upper and lower case words. Mixed case also assists the brain in identifying proper names, sentence structure, and so forth.

So, bottom line is that in most situations you should use mixed case in emails.

References:
Sarah Greer, Elizabeth Sowden, and Lauren F. V. Scharff; Stephen F. Austin State University (July 20, 2005). Email Format and Instructions: Influences on Reading Times, Retention, and Preferences, American Journal of Psychology Research. http://www.mcneese.edu/colleges/ed/deptpsy/ajpr/vol1/ajpr11.pdf